|
September 22, 2026 | SIGN UP
Ronan Shields In theory, the Google ad tech antitrust ruling was about letting others in, not letting Google off, but are there workarounds? That was the key question many posed, as the rulings focused on just what terms Google would have to agree to after it escaped a forced divestiture of its ad tech assets midway through last week. Much attention has also focused on the proposed mechanisms to ensure Google’s compliance with the judgment. The independent overseer bodies, dubbed “the monitor” and “the technical committee,” will likely face scrutiny in the coming weeks, months and years. However, as Jay Friedman, cofounder of Cartograph, told Digiday, "The reason expert testimony was needed in this case is that the complexity and ability to obfuscate non-compliance are equally high. "Buyers should ask themselves, ‘If I wanted to comply with the letter of this ruling yet still maintain an advantage, could I?’ Their answer should instruct them on how to proceed going forward." Friedman said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Top stories
GOOGLE ON TRIAL
Register for this webinar on Oct. 14 at 10 a.m. ET for insights into how marketers are compressing the CTV-to-conversion journey and driving measurable performance.
Other things to know
|