In which a man bombs a foreign country in a bid to win a peace award
͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌     

Now, where’s my prize? | The Guardian

Support independent journalism

}}}
This Week in Trumpland - The Guardian
Trump gives thumbs up with sky behind him
Jun 25, 2025

Now, where’s my prize?

In which a man bombs a foreign country in a bid to win a peace award

Adam Gabbatt Adam Gabbatt
 

Hello, there,

Donald Trump is totally OK with not getting a Nobel peace prize. We know that because he said so, in a sprawling Truth Social post over the weekend.

Trump claimed to have stopped a war between India and Pakistan – India’s prime minister says the US had no role in easing the conflict – and waffled about the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Rwanda, and Serbia, and Kosovo, and Ethiopia, and Egypt. He then complained, five times: “I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize.”

He concluded: “But the people know, and that’s all that matters to me!”

Trump’s post certainly seemed like the kind of thing one would expect from a person for whom it really mattered that they get a Nobel peace prize. “He’s obsessed with the fact that Mr Obama got it and he didn’t,” a former senior White House official from Trump’s first term told NBC, which will come as no surprise to anyone who has followed Trump’s long-time fixation with the 44th president.

If Trump does want the prize (he does), then he is taking an unusual approach, given the award is not typically awarded to people who have just attacked a foreign country. Especially not when Iran was still seeking negotiation with the US even after having just been attacked by Israel.

Trump, the great peacemaker, claimed over the weekend that the strikes had “totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites and set the country’s alleged nuclear weapon program back “decades”. The Nobel aspirant added that the US attacks were “essentially the same thing” as the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. (In a neat irony, last year the Nobel peace prize was awarded to a group that represents survivors of those bombings.)

Trump’s claims of huge success were almost immediately contradicted, however, by a leaked government report saying the strikes had only set Iran’s nuclear program back a few months.

But hey, Trump is the leader, and what he says goes. Pete Hegseth, Trump’s jock defense secretary, and Marco Rubio, the increasingly emasculated secretary of state, lined up to trot out the same line as their boss, with Hegseth claiming that Trump’s “bold and visionary leadership” had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Trump’s confused bid for peace has not been well-received at home. A majority of Americans disapprove of the US attacking Iran, according to multiple polls, while fully 79% of Americans say they are worried Iran may retaliate against US civilians.

In a further blow, a Ukrainian lawmaker who nominated Trump for a Nobel peace prize withdrew the nomination on Tuesday. Oleksandr Merezhko told Newsweek he had “lost any sort of faith and belief” in Trump and his ability to secure a ceasefire. Meanwhile on Monday, Pakistan condemned Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying it planned to nominate him for the peace prize.

At least Trump’s fanboys are backing the ruse. Lindsay Graham, the Republican senator, said Trump deserves “a Nobel Peace Prize on steroids”, whatever that means, while Buddy Carter, an oddball Republican representative from Georgia (in February, he introduced a bill to name Greenland to “Red, white and blueland”), is also on board. On Tuesday, the self-described “Maga warrior” took a break from tweeting about trans people to nominate Trump for that Nobel peace prize, hailing Trump’s “bold actions to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions”, in a letter that Trump quickly shared on Truth Social.

The only problem? The deadline for 2025 nominations was 31 January. Sorry, Buddy!

The yanker becomes the yankee

Nato Top: King Receives Trump at Audience (Pole), The Hague, The Netherlands - 25 Jun 2025Mandatory Credit: Photo by Hollandse Hoogte/Shutterstock (15372992a) THE HAGUE - U.S. President Donald Trump, with King Willem-Alexander and King Maxima during a photo opportunity at Huis ten Bosch palace. Trump stranded overnight with the royal couple at Huis ten Bosch palace during the NATO summit. Nato Top: King Receives Trump at Audience (Pole), The Hague, The Netherlands - 25 Jun 2025

Trump is known for his distinctive power-handshake. It’s a move that involves the dominant handshaker yanking their co-shaker towards them the second they grasp hands, like someone pulling open a heavy door.

The 79-year-old president has deployed it against world leaders and cabinet members alike. It probably reveals as much about Trump’s insecurity as it does his alpha status, but nevertheless he has stuck with it for years.

So you’d have thought Trump would have been upset on Tuesday, when the king of the Netherlands used his own move against him: Willem-Alexander hauled Trump towards him when they met at the Nato summit. But the US president, who has an odd fascination with royalty, seemed to have gotten over it by Wednesday, when he described the Dutch king and queen as “beautiful and spectacular people” in remarks to reporters.

Maybe that rare bout of being diplomatic is all part of Trump’s cunning plan to get the Nobel peace prize. The one he definitely isn’t bothered about receiving.

 
The Guardian Investigates: Missing in the Amazon

What terrible truth were they trying to expose?

Our new six-part investigative podcast series uncovers what happened to a journalist and an indigenous defender after disappearing in the Amazon.

New episodes every Monday.

 
 

Betsy Reed

Editor, Guardian US

Person Image

I hope you appreciated this newsletter. Before you move on, I wanted to ask whether you could support the Guardian’s journalism as we face the unprecedented challenges of covering the second Trump administration.

As Trump himself observed: “The first term, everybody was fighting me. In this term, everybody wants to be my friend.”

He’s not entirely wrong. All around us, media organizations have begun to capitulate. First, two news outlets pulled election endorsements at the behest of their billionaire owners. Next, prominent reporters bent the knee at Mar-a-Lago. And then a major network – ABC News – rolled over in response to Trump’s legal challenges and agreed to a $16m million settlement in his favor.

The Guardian is clear: we have no interest in being Donald Trump’s – or any politician’s – friend. Our allegiance as independent journalists is not to those in power but to the public.

How are we able to stand firm in the face of intimidation and threats? As journalists say: follow the money. The Guardian has neither a self-interested billionaire owner nor profit-seeking corporate henchmen pressuring us to appease the rich and powerful. We are funded by our readers and owned by the Scott Trust – whose only financial obligation is to preserve our journalistic mission in perpetuity.

With the new administration boasting about its desire to punish journalists, and Trump and his allies already pursuing lawsuits against newspapers whose stories they don’t like, it has never been more urgent, or more perilous, to pursue fair, accurate reporting. Can you support the Guardian today?

We value whatever you can spare, but a recurring contribution makes the most impact, enabling greater investment in our most crucial, fearless journalism. As our thanks to you, we can offer you some great benefits. We’ve made it very quick to set up, so we hope you’ll consider it.

However you choose to support us: thank you for helping protect the free press. Whatever happens in the coming months and years, you can rely on the Guardian never to bow down to power, nor back down from truth.

 
}}}
Get in touch
If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@theguardian.com
https://www.theguardian.com/uk